What we're testing
Pott Candles
19 October 2026
← All tests

Tomato Vine: which opening line sells the scent

Too early to callAd copy · writing structureStarted 12 Oct
£489 spent across 5 versions in 7 days. Too early to call; verdict due around 9 Nov.
What we think

Same question as the Cook round, on Tomato Vine. Two of the five texts are the live controls (review first and two makers first); three are new (question, scene, short).

What is different between the versions

The opening structure of the primary text only. Same six videos, same link, same audience.

When we call it

£150 spent on each version, or 28 days, whichever comes first. Not before.

Progress to a verdict
25% · due around 9 Nov
What this will tell us

Whether the Cook result repeats on a different product, which would make it a rule for Pott copy rather than a one-off.

Over time

Cost per purchase, running total

Each day's line is the whole test so far, so it settles as the numbers grow

Question firstReview firstScene firstTwo makers firstShort copy

Spend per day

Shows whether every version is getting its share

Question firstReview firstScene firstTwo makers firstShort copy

Purchases, running total

The count behind the cost per purchase

Question firstReview firstScene firstTwo makers firstShort copy

Click-through rate, running total

The earliest signal: does the ad earn the click

Question firstReview firstScene firstTwo makers firstShort copy
Versions
VersionSpentLink clicksCTRPurchasesCost per purchasePurchases per clickROAS
Question first £000.00% 0–0.00%0.00x
Review first £175880.98% 9£19.4910.23%4.28x
Scene first £161901.32% 6£26.766.67%2.40x
Two makers first £98.55410.99% 2£49.274.88%1.26x
Short copy £54.19150.54% 2£27.1013.33%3.39x
Read on: cost per purchase. Click-through rate is the early signal while purchase counts are small.
Day-by-day figures
DayQuestion first
spend · clicks · purchases
Review first
spend · clicks · purchases
Scene first
spend · clicks · purchases
Two makers first
spend · clicks · purchases
Short copy
spend · clicks · purchases
12 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£13.45 · 6 · 0£9.71 · 7 · 0£5.37 · 1 · 0£6.81 · 2 · 1
13 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£28.66 · 11 · 2£23.74 · 11 · 0£10.67 · 5 · 0£5.49 · 1 · 0
14 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£20.39 · 8 · 0£12.74 · 5 · 1£12.55 · 6 · 0£5.48 · 1 · 0
15 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£12.77 · 5 · 0£12.43 · 6 · 0£16.30 · 3 · 1£9.14 · 4 · 0
16 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£28.07 · 15 · 0£13.06 · 13 · 1£11.43 · 3 · 0£5.00 · 2 · 1
17 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£37.61 · 24 · 5£37.07 · 25 · 1£21.15 · 13 · 0£8.32 · 1 · 0
18 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£34.19 · 19 · 2£49.80 · 23 · 3£20.90 · 10 · 1£13.25 · 4 · 0
19 Oct£0 · 0 · 0£0.27 · 0 · 0£1.99 · 0 · 0£0.18 · 0 · 0£0.70 · 0 · 0
How this is read

The 5 texts run as options inside 6 ads. Meta chooses which text each person sees, so the texts never get equal spend, and Reels and Stories show no primary text at all, so text spend adds up to less than the ads' total. Per-text results are a steer, not a verdict: a colder text can look weaker while still doing its job for people who are not ready yet. Not served at all so far: Question first.

Spend, clicks and purchases are as reported by Meta for the ads in each test, from the test's start date to today, which is partial. Where versions share an ad set, Meta decides how much each one spends, so compare cost per purchase and purchases per click rather than totals. A test is only called once its rule is met; stopping early on a good week is how false winners get made.